Comments for Georgia Tenth Amendment Center

Comment on Georgia Secretary of State Pursues Five Obama Eligibility Complaints by Ayla85

Ayla85 — Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:44:40 +0000

Even though many criticism were Obama’s receive as he sit, I still believe with him.

Comment on Georgia to consider creation of Constitutional Guardian Advisory Council by zebblanc

zebblanc — Sat, 07 Jan 2012 20:15:43 +0000

A good companion to this in the Senate is Loudermilks’s SR122 which he dropped in the beginning of the current session (2011-2012).

http://www1.legis.ga.gov/legis/2011_12/versions/sr122_As_introduced_LC_94_3931_2.htm

This resolution was to have created a committee to study states’ rights legislation. It was to come up with a comprehensive and prioritized list for presentation to the general assemblies. It and all other 10A issues died in committee.

C4L is advocating for 2A legislation. This is probably not appropriate as there are much higher priority issues that need to be addressed. Many are addressed in the HB above.

AfP will go for the “big biz” legislation to support their GOP sponsors.

Reclaiming state sovereignty is the only way to back out of the fedgov strangle hold on personal liberties. How to find enough weasels dedicated to this effort is the conundrum.

Zeb Blanchard

zebblanc2@gmail.com

Comment on Georgia Secretary of State Pursues Five Obama Eligibility Complaints by old1

old1 — Wed, 21 Dec 2011 05:44:25 +0000

Want to help in your State? http://obamaballotchallenge.com/

Comment on Is Abortion a States' Rights Issue?-Bill Greene by Reuven

Reuven — Wed, 14 Sep 2011 03:50:34 +0000

The right to Abortion is guaranteed under the fourth and fourteenth amendments.
To say otherwise, is to call for their immediate repeal.

Anti-Choice people need to understand that Roe will never be overturned. It was an excellent ruling, in line with the Constitution and morality. I can not speak for God, but I see no reason to propose that God is not pro-choice when the Bible clearly states life begins at first breath (ie, after birth)

Comment on Message From Tom Graves About His Vote On HB5566 by Tsani Jones

Tsani Jones — Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:27:14 +0000

I am so glad this man is my Representative. Finally, someone who actually does what he said he would do.

Comment on Is Abortion a States' Rights Issue?-Bill Greene by Bruce Barron

Bruce Barron — Mon, 20 Sep 2010 03:35:00 +0000

Each state can choose to make abortion unlawful any time it wants. States have rights and obligations and powers.If the individual asking the question means is it the right of the state,it's government,to bring this issue up for discussion and act on it appropriately,then it is right for the state to do so and is a state's right issue since it behooves the state to do what is right and just,that is,it is obligatory.The abortion law is both unjust and unconstitutional for a number of reasons.Do the States have rights qua state?Of course they do.

Comment on Roy Barnes' Qualms With Previous Legislative Action by Mike Ameye

Mike Ameye — Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:21:47 +0000

Comment Continued…

{Unless a contrary intent explicitly appears then legislation is meant to apply ONLY within the territorial [geographic] jurisdiction of the United States. See UNITED STATES V. SPELAR, 338 U.S. 217, 70 S.Ct. 10 (1949), FOLEY BROS. V. FILARDO , 336 U.S. 281, 69 S.Ct. 575 (1949), Blackmer v. United States, 284 U.S. 421, 437, 52 S.Ct. 252, 254 (1932)}

Something to think about and explore…

Comment on Roy Barnes' Qualms With Previous Legislative Action by Mike Ameye

Mike Ameye — Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:21:15 +0000

The thing that we must remember here is the legislative jurisdiction in which the Federal Government has passed some of this "law". While it is true that education for example is not a "power" enumerated in the Constitution for the Federal government – it IS a power that it can exersize in it's "geographic" capacity. That is the capacity the Fed has over it's territories, possessions and other places where the States have seeded jurisdiction to it.

The problem comes down to a mis-application of "geographic" law on a "Federal" level. We the People and the States need to wake up and start questioning the Feds EVERY time some piece of legislation gets passed by that body… If the intent is to make a law applicable in the several States and the territories and possessions, then it MUST say so in the preamble of the Act or Bill being voted on. If it does not specifically state this then the courts will interpret the law to apply only in Federal territories and possessions.

CONT…

Comment on Message From Tom Graves About His Vote On HB5566 by profg

profg — Sat, 07 Aug 2010 20:23:29 +0000

Michele, I don't think you read Rep. Graves letter. If you had, you would see that he voted against it because such a law would be UNCONSTITUTIONAL. It doesn't matter how much you "feel" a law should be passed – if the Constitution doesn't give Congress the AUTHORITY to pass it, IT SHOULD BE VOTED DOWN.

PERIOD.

Please, read the Constitution, read the bill, realized that the two are incompatible, and thank Rep. Graves.

Comment on Last Chance To Get Half Price On Nullify Now Tickets!!! by The Moral Liberal

The Moral Liberal — Tue, 03 Aug 2010 18:28:29 +0000

Attend “Nullify Now!”…

The Moral Liberal Lookin’ at ya…